Gun Control Persuasive Paper Essay

A gun control virtue is any law that restricts the use of goods and services, purchase, or possession of any firearms (Conservapedia). These laws atomic number 18 implemented to reduce the use of firearms to authorized members of a rural areas government. Each state in America has its own laws regarding gun control however, among all, California has the strongest laws, scoring 81 out of a 100 (OMara). Gun control laws are inevitable in a state because they decline violence, increase governments tribute in the state, and decrease the lethalness of other crimes.Gun control laws gutter reduce violence and crime. In the United States, 67% of crimes in 2010 were act with firearms (Rogers, 2007). This means that majority of crimes committed in America had guns and other firearms involved. If firearms are prohibited in the state, then in guess, crime rates impart go down by 67%. Guns have the ability to throng someones life. Having that said, disallowing the use of guns can non alone decrease crime rates, but lower causalities as well.Ozanne-Smith et al (2004) arrived at a similar conclusion in a study conducted in Victoria, Australia aft(prenominal) examining the trend in the firearm- tie in deaths in the context of strong legislative reform. They name the followingSignificant and dramatic declines in rates of firearm related deaths occurred in Victoria and Australia after periods of strong legislative reform. Statistically fundamental reductions in firearm related suicides were observed after legislative reforms. In 2000, rates of firearm related deaths were less than two per 100 000 world for Victoria and Australia compared with 10.4 per 100 000 population for the United States. In Victoria, reductions in the numbers of registered firearms of 25% and of licensed shooters of 15% were seen over the four years amidst 199798 and 200001 (Ozanne-Smith, 2004).Prohibiting civilians from using guns can increase the effectiveness of the police in ones sta te. When a person owns a gun, in theory he can protect himself and therefore does non need protection from the police. Thus, he becomes independent. However, if a person is not allowed to own a gun, he becomes more(prenominal) dependent upon the government for his safety and the police and the government straight becomes more aware of the importance of their task in protecting their state.Lastly, the bulwark of firearms can decrease the lethalness of crimes other than murder and homicide. Often times, minor criminals standardised thieves and robbers commit their crimes with a firearm, when in reality the commission of their crime does not require it. They simply use the guns for self-defense. As a result, they are more likely to kill their victims rather than just stealing from them. Therefore, they not only steal, but they kill as well. The prohibition of firearms can lessen a criminals ability from committing another crime by change magnitude the probability of murder and ho micide.However, firearms have its benefits as well. But if the aforementioned is not used in the right way, it will lead to serious consequences including death. Thats why gun control laws are implied in a state to regulate and prevent the misuse of such firearms.