Blood Covenant Essay

This keep back, which is actually twain books in one, has cardinal main parts. Book one which covers from page 21 to page 200 is well-nigh Michael Franzeses lifetime before his revolution to Christianity.In the first paragraph of the book, which is in page 22 of the book, the compose says To image me and the path I took in life, it is necessary to first understand my father, mob enforcer John Franzese accordingly follows a long tarradiddle of his father better known as Sonny and his exploits around about 1960s, this first book on franzeses life as a Mafia leader sets the stage for the second part of the book entitle book 2 which is carries the title The New Life in Christ.The book overly has a brief photo insert between the two main parts of the book. After the epilogue of the book, there is a petty section written by Camille Garcia, Franzeses wife, which is thereafter followed by afterword and then appendix. 2. Express ideas in your own words. Utilize book content, which will comport your ideas and conclusions. sequence it remains a fact that there are or so serious holes with the book in that well-nigh of the events can non be pinpointed in a timeline map, there are still some considerations and positive points about he book.Part two of the book basically outlines the Christian life that Franzese lives and opposite motivational stuff ilk how to avoid the mafia and so on. 3. Do you as the reader accept or reject the causes argument? Do they make sense? Do you feel they are accurate or valid? Are they logical? Does the source develop himself as be credible to the reader? I accept the authors arguments. Even though some of the details are not clear and may need validation, there is a truth to the facts and feelings of Franzese.It has been say that this book, Franzeses second, is the rendition of the first, called Quitting the family unit which was published in 1992, with some some addition of words. The various issues that raise the iss ue of credibility to the readers are that since he take hundreds of millions of dollars. What happened to this cash, did the mob get it? Why has the mob never come on after him even after testifying to the grand jury? These are some of the questions that are left hanging sledding the reader thinking staidly about the credibility of the story. 4.Has the author included all the important variables or factors in his analysis? For example, are there any inconsistencies or contradictions in his arguments? If so, what are they? No. the author has failed in a number of ways. any(prenominal) of the information that is provided by Franzese is either in the unrestricted domain or cannot be independently verified. His claim that he had met by his own admission, stole hundreds of millions of dollars dont answer some primary questions like what happened to the money? How come the mob never came after him after he testified in front of the grand jury?How did he break parole and some other questions? 5. To what extent if any is Franzese different from Sammy the Bull Gravano? What are their similarities? Did you look on individual more believable that the other? Why? magic spell Franzese sullen to a Christian and totally ignored the Colombo family to which he had swore an oath to, Sammy turned to be a CIA informer on the activities of the Gambinos. He had a plastic surgery to hide from the mob but move to live a life of abandon and violence after leaving the US source Protection Programme.While Franzese changed because of the girl he met, Sammy changed to be an informer because his then boss, John Gotti, wanted to alienate him so that Sammy could be seen as the mad one after their arrest. Franzese and Sammy are similar in that they have both written books on their lives with the mafia. Franzese has written two books, Quitting the Mob and Blood Covenant while Sammy wrote a book called Underboss. They are also recorded as the first top ranking members of the mafia who turned on their oath, Franzese to Christianity and Sammy to a Spy.Finally both of them have been invited for in the public eye(predicate) lectures and motivational talks. Sammys story is believable and reliable since it can be O.K. by other sources like the CIA this is not the case with Franzeses story. 6. given(p) what you have learned about Organized crime were you convinced of the authors contentions? If not, what evidence would need to be presented to be convinced? there need to be somebody who can verify the stories given Franzese. His public talks and lectures make it necessary for people to really understand what do him do the things he did.7. What did you find most important and least valuable of the information presented by the author? This story gives a not-so-detailed account of the Franzese life with the Mafia. Some of the details provided are a little hazy and tough to verify, if not outright absurd. When he claims for example that he says that he make a lot of money and that he had connections with other mafia bosses like Jon Gotti, , Don King, Reverand Al Sharpton and others but doesnt reveal anything he public domain about them make a person somewhat disappointed.8. The end point for both Gravano and Franzese are very different. What factors and theoretical perspectives can account for this? While Franzese claims that it was due to the influence of his wife that he left the life of being a mafia, Sammy turned to be an informer when he realized that the then boss, john Gotti, was bent on portraying him as mad and a cold blood killer. This made him to turn into a state witness against the john Gotti. References Franzese Michael. Blood Covenant. Chicago Whitaker House, 2003