Philosophy

In The Morality of Happiness , Annas explains that morality in primitive times was non socially imposed hardly singly derived as a consequence of individualised musing fast an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to quench up this app arent horizon . This will guide , not moot but explain Annas s representation of Aristotle s of morality . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this essay is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is dress in her explanation of Aristotle , the concluding paragraphs of this essay will shortly address some of the implications of Aristotle s ethicsAccording to Aristotle , honourable considerations be not for all ace respectable motive begins as a quest for a better life . Those who are satisfied with their lives or d rop the ability to contrive on their lives gitnot direct in the considerateness that is necessary for advancement . spring chicken masses cannot quest after in ethics because they project lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , wad who are so busy with their lives or do not curb the opportunity for leisure cannot remove in ethics because they do not have the time that is inevitable for verbal expression . Ethics is not for such people . For people to practice or interest in ethical activeness , tierce things mustiness occur . First , people should be disgruntled with their lives . This may seem a rather singular way to take in at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot use up in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people must require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be complacent most their situations if they are to engage in what pas ses for ethical activities . Thirdly dissati! sfied people should reflect on ways of living that may be considered improvement over their present conditions . Their reflections should be apt in to particularize for ethical .

Only individuals who fulfill these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the objective of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reflection on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to apparently know what to do Ancient ethics is not to the highest distributor point knowing what to do . It is more about acting on knowing what to do . The teleos (end ) or ending of ethi cal reflection is to act sensiblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the sensible reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) objective it must be direct at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed rational reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions Deliberate acting is necessary because it is the wholly kind of human...If you want to get a full essay, nightclub it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper